Pseudo-Intellectualism is Fun (Part 2)

JAKEFRANKDOGG
Of course The KING PRAWN is correct and the KNAPPY is incorrect. Time does exist. it is the Human perception of time (as a two dimensional line - future, present, past) that the knapton is refering to. So the Knapton could argue that his definition of flux is accurate for any human subject. and seeing that he was not trying to define flux for dogs, he is accurate. The true definition of flux would be hard to come by, considering that the space-time continuum is in more than three dimensions. thus, to our feeble brains, everything is happening everywhere at the same time, and nothing is everything and nothing (I mean absolute nothing - no light, dark, vacuum, pressure; no space, particles (atoms, electrons or quarks) exists (or does no exist I suppose) at some point in space time.

I think its best to stick to definitions we can define, rather than the ones we can't.